AI made your people faster.
But not your business.
In 30 days, your first business result from AI. One process, redesigned and measured.
45-minute scan, free €3,000 fixed 30 days one process your systems, your credentials
There's a 5% and a 95%. The difference isn't the technology.
95%
of organizations get zero return on AI.
- Adoption, no transformation.
- Pilots that stall before production.
- Tools that make the person at the keyboard faster.
5%
of integrated AI pilots extract millions in value.
- Narrow workflows, redesigned end to end.
- Measured in business results, not hours saved.
- They execute their strategy better because of AI.
The 95% aren't doing nothing. Their people are faster and happier, and that beats banning it.
But none of it finishes a process and proves it.
MIT NANDA · The GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025 · July 2025
Two different denominators, quoted as MIT NANDA reported them. Organizations in the first number, integrated pilots in the second. They are not two halves of one pie and we are not going to pretend they are.
A quick check. Five questions.
About a minute. We don't ask for your email, and the answer is yours whether or not you ever talk to us.
-
1. Is anyone using AI to write better emails, summarise a document, or clean up a spreadsheet?
Yes. This is true in every company we talk to.
-
2. Has one whole process changed because of it, start to finish?
Faster drafting is a step. Inbound lead to booked meeting is a process.
-
3. Do you know what that process cost before AI touched it?
Minutes per run or euros per unit, written down at the time. Not reconstructed afterwards.
-
4. Has the improvement shown up anywhere your CFO looks?
A line in a report they already read, not a story in a meeting.
-
5. Has AI changed how your leadership team runs the company?
Setting priorities, seeing where execution is stuck, deciding what's next. Not writing the board update faster.
You stopped at two. So does almost everyone.
It isn't a failure. It's what AI adoption looks like in most companies right now: real activity, real enthusiasm, and nothing that reaches the P&L. The gap between where you are and a measured result is one process, thirty days, and a baseline captured before you start.
Book the 45 minutesYou're further than most, and you're one step short of the part that counts.
You have a process moving. What you probably don't have is the before, written down at the time, in a number someone outside your team already tracks. That's the piece that makes the next agent easy to fund.
Book the 45 minutesYou're in the 5%. The sprint isn't for you.
If all five are true, you've done the hard part, and paying us €3,000 to prove something you've already proved would be a waste of your money. The interesting conversation is how fast you scale it. Happy to have that one instead.
Email Darko directlyEveryone does one of these. All of them are reasonable.
Your own people
- Works
- Free. Starts Monday. They know how the work actually runs.
- Doesn't
- They fix what annoys them. Nobody measures it, nobody owns it, and it's never quite finished.
Hire someone
- Works
- One person doing the whole job, adapting as it changes.
- Doesn't
- Day one is four months away. And when they leave, the knowledge leaves with them.
The AI you already pay for
- Works
- Nothing to buy. Nothing to approve. Works today.
- Doesn't
- It speeds up the person at the keyboard. It doesn't touch the ten steps either side of them.
A developer or an agency
- Works
- Quick, and they've built this before.
- Doesn't
- They build what you spec. So the thinking stays your job. So does the measuring.
And the one most companies pick: wait. Cheaper this quarter. Next year it’s the same conversation with a longer list.
All of them produce activity. None of them is built to finish a process and prove it.
That isn't a criticism of your people. It's not what these approaches are for.
MIT NANDA found strategic partnerships are twice as likely to succeed as internal builds.
The difference is where you start.
Prompting and pilots
Start from the tool. Someone automates the step that annoys them most.
- Detached from the strategy. Nobody chose it because it mattered most.
- A fragment. It improves a step, not the process.
Individuals get faster.
The 5%
Start from the strategy. Where does AI change what’s possible for the business?
- Tied to a priority someone is already measured on.
- One process, end to end.
The business gets different.
Same technology. Two outcomes. And only one of them leaves you with a number.
We add the layer that’s missing between your strategy and your tools.
Today
- Scattered.
- Nobody owns it.
- Nothing to report.
The layer
- A priority worth moving
- The workflow, redesigned
- Who does what, who approves
- The agent, inside guardrails
- Monitoring you can see
- A number that moved
That's the layer. We build it for one process, in 30 days.
For companies that want AI to fuel growth. Not to speed up typing.
AI Value Scan
- 45 minutes. Free.
- You leave with a one-page map of where an agent pays first.
30-Day Production Proof
- One process. One agent. One number.
€3,000 fixed
What happens in the 30 daysTransformation & Scale
- The next agents, the six-month roadmap, the platform.
From €3,000 a month
Effective, because it starts in the right place. Fast, because it takes thirty days. Low risk, because it costs less than one month of a junior salary.
The whole process. And the map for the next one.
What you hold on day 31.
The agent
Runs the process start to finish, on the priority you picked. Live, in your systems, doing real work.
The half that stays human
Every task in that process sorted: person, shared, or agent. The human half written up properly, so you keep a documented upgrade to how the work runs even if you stop.
The number
The baseline, captured before go-live, and the after-measure against it. One page. It goes in front of your CEO without translation.
The map
A six-month roadmap in priority order. What to automate next, what to leave alone, and why.
Thirty days is the beginning of the transformation. It is not a claim that your whole company gets transformed in a month.
A system, run by people.
The system compiles the agent from your process: what it reads, what it writes, who approves what, what counts as done. That's why it takes thirty days instead of six months, and why your second agent costs less than your first. Then people run it with you.
You give us one name.
One owner on your side who knows the process and can decide things about it. That name is the real commitment, not the invoice.
We sit in it for thirty days.
Picking the process, capturing the baseline, redesigning the workflow, setting the approval rules, running it in a sandbox, then going live.
A human owner approves every real action, until you say otherwise.
The gates loosen when you decide you're comfortable. Not before.
And it keeps running with or without us in the room.
The harness is yours, the documentation is yours, and nothing about it lives in one consultant's head.
Two companies took the other road.
“RELIABL.IT helped us revamp our strategy and kickstart our AI transformation.”
“We’re investing in our people so they can lead this transformation, not chase it.”
Both went all in, top down. That’s good practice: bigger upside, and bigger risk over a longer timeline.
We're offering the faster, lower-risk way in. After the proof, how fast you scale is your call. We're not limited by consultants. We have a system.
What we don't have yet
We have not published a measured before-and-after from a completed sprint. When we have one, the numbers go on this page.
Until then, everything above is a method and an argument. Weigh it as one, and ask us hard questions on the call.
The questions we usually get.
“Couldn’t we just hire you to set this up for us?”
You could, and it would take longer and cost more. The system builds a better harness than a person can, in less time, because it compiles from your process instead of writing it from scratch. And it keeps running with or without us in the room, which a consultant can’t offer. Ask us to show you one running.
“How do I know the agent won’t do something stupid?”
A person approves every real action on the early runs. Escalation rules get agreed before go-live, not after something goes wrong. The first runs happen in a sandbox. The gates loosen only when you say so. If the agent is unsure, it stops and asks. It never guesses on a write.
“Our IT and security will never allow this.”
It runs in your environment, on your credentials, through a scoped account with access to exactly the places named in the harness and nowhere else. We hold none of your operational data. Nothing gets ripped out and nothing gets replaced. We design it, you run it.
“We don’t really have that process written down.”
Then we bring the framework and define it with you. It doesn’t change the price or the date.
“€3,000 seems too cheap to be real.”
Fair. It’s cheap because it’s narrow. One process, one agent, one metric, thirty days. We are not transforming your company for €3,000. We’re proving one thing works, in production, with a number. What comes after is priced like real work.
“We need to think about it.”
Nothing bad happens if you wait. That’s exactly why it keeps getting postponed. What changes is that next year you make this same call with more processes queued up and less time. The cheapest way to stop thinking about it is the 45 minutes.
45 minutes. You keep the map either way.
You leave the call with:
- A one-page opportunity map
- The process we’d start on
- The number we’d move
- A fixed price and a date
It costs you 45 minutes whether or not you ever buy anything.
Darko Butina, Founder